Cover  pg.2  pg.3  pg.4  pg.5  pg.6  pg.7  pg.8  pg.9  pg.10  pg.11  pg.12  pg.13  pg.14  pg.15  pg.16  pg.17  pg.18  pg.19  pg.20  pg.21  pg.22  pg.23  pg.24
Return to homepage or
My contact information


CONCLUSIONS

In my estimation there is no reason for the continued exclusion from the weatherization program of approximately 70% of the electrically heated homes in the B.P.A. region. The concerns raised by the E.I.S. can in every case be dealt with by cost effective mitigation by action.

Plumbing and electrical penetrations should be more completely and thoroughly dealt with. These penetrations are substantial and I feel represent some of the reason for the rather conservative estimation of the potential energy savings available.

Water vapor is such an obvious indoor air quality issue I still find it difficult to believe that it was over looked. In my experience as a designer, consultant and auditor, moisture damage has been a common thread in the problems to be solved in the properly weatherized home.

The B.P.A. has an excellent opportunity to not only save large amounts of energy, but to maintain and even improve the indoor air quality of most homes. I urge the B.P.A. to move ahead quickly and aggressively with a program that will provide both jobs and energy through the proven means of conservation.